http://charlesheflin.disqus.com/enSat, 05 Jul 2008 08:35:47 -0000http://www.charlesheflin.com/wikipedia-and-your-credibility/#comment-1868238<p>Wait a minute ... does this mean that Google was basically spamming?</p><p>I almost feel blasphemous to suggest it. Did I miss something? Google is not only the receiver of these types of tactics, but also tries them out once in a while?</p>AnnaSat, 05 Jul 2008 08:35:47 -0000http://www.charlesheflin.com/wikipedia-and-your-credibility/#comment-1868239<p>That is where we are heading. Internet marketing is fundamentally changing as a result of social interaction and smarter consumers.</p>CharlesFri, 20 Jun 2008 18:38:10 -0000http://www.charlesheflin.com/wikipedia-and-your-credibility/#comment-1868237<p>This is sound advice, and applies to other sites as well. You must maintain a "trajectory" through the 'net, and show consistency in your postings. In the long run, all we'll have is our "rep" and of course we'll be just like Wikipedia--fighting off the faux posters forever.</p>Gregory SudderthTue, 17 Jun 2008 16:56:24 -0000